Fedora 44 on the Raspberry Pi 5 (nullr0ute.com)

by jandeboevrie 40 comments 123 points
Read article View on HN

40 comments

[−] samtrack2019 62d ago
I replaced my custom nightmare of nixos on rpi5 (too much disk space used, too much IO used for raspberry) to a raspbian+arm+homebrew and i could not be happier
[−] sourcegrift 62d ago
Oh no, i was going to setup the same, would you mind sharing more details? I just need a text-only linux for basic stuff. Do you share your nixos config anywhere?
[−] freedomben 62d ago
Sadly, I came to the same conclusion. This is also why I no longer buy raspberry pis.
[−] stefan_ 63d ago
Good reminder that the Raspberry Pis only have good software support if you stick to whatever the foundation is releasing. Because that same foundation has stayed obsessed with their weird custom ways of doing things, instead of furthering efforts like UEFI on ARM. Some of it is insultingly stupid - like for revD of the 5, you better now update the magic boot partition of your RPi with the device tree overlay for revD, because it will use the old device tree, but also expect the overlay to be there so it can actually work. To say the least, that is never what overlays were supposed to be for.
[−] morpheuskafka 63d ago

> custom ways of doing things, instead of furthering efforts like UEFI on ARM.

I thought uBoot was more or less the standard way of booting embedded Linux? Is it really worth bringing the entire UEFI environment, which is basically a mini OS, to such devices? Embedded devices are often designed to handle power loss or even be unplugged by users, so the boot up process is generally as lean as possible.

[−] my123 63d ago
U-Boot nowadays speaks UEFI :) (and so does LK)

New Android devices all use a UEFI bootloader: https://source.android.com/docs/core/architecture/bootloader...

[−] praseodym 63d ago
This is exactly why I’ve to replaced my home server by a low-power x86 NUC instead. No custom build needed to run NixOS and idle power consumption turns out to be slightly lower than the Raspberry Pi 5.
[−] moffkalast 62d ago
Idle consumption is truly horrid on the Pi 5, even with all the hacks and turning absolutely everything off and hobbling the SoC to 500 Mhz it's imposible to get it under 2W. I'm convinced that the Pi Foundation doesn't think battery powered applications are like, a thing that physically exists.
[−] elnatro 62d ago
Allow me to ask you what’s the NUC computer you are using?
[−] praseodym 62d ago
I’m using an ASUS NUC 14 Essential Kit N355. It’s a bit more expensive than the Pi 5, but also more powerful (8 cores and decent GPU). There is also a more affordable N150 model. And even lower budget are the N150 mini PCs from Chinese manufacturers, but they often mess up things like cooling in a hardware revision (compared to the favorable review that you’d read).

And forgot to mention this before: Intel CPUs with built-in GPUs have very performant and energy efficient hardware video codecs, whereas the Raspberry Pi 5 is limited and lacks software support.

[−] daymanstep 62d ago
And what is the idle power draw that you're seeing on the NUC? Out of the box or did you have to mess around with BIOS and powertop?
[−] spockz 62d ago
I get 3-5W, mostly 4W on my N100 nuc. WiFi disabled through bios. And I ran powertop and made the suggested changes. 1 stick of 16gib lpDDR5, 1 nvme ssd, 1 4TB SATA ssd. Under full cpu load usage goes up to 8-12W. When also the gpu is busy with encoding the consumption grows to 20-24W. This is with turbo clock enabled. With it disabled power draw stays around 4W, but it is annoyingly slow I enabled turbo again and just content with the odd power peak.
[−] praseodym 62d ago
I'm seeing 4-4.5 Watt idle. I've disabled WiFi in the BIOS (using wired Ethernet) and ran powertop --auto-tune, but not much else.
[−] tomaskafka 62d ago
I am not the OP, but I got an $150 (at a time) fanless quad core Celeron box at Aliexpress about 5 years ago, and it just runs with zero problems with openmediavault and dockers. Attached is external HDD over USB 3, it’s still fast enough (and the HDD is the bottleneck, not the USB interface).
[−] rokweom 62d ago
Few months ago it was possible to get Intel N100 (i5-6400 performance at much lower power) based mini PC with 8GB RAM and 256GB SSD for 100-120 USD on sale. Unfortunately, 'rampocalypse' happened.
[−] prox 62d ago
I wonder if I can run this on a 2 year old celeron laptop
[−] actionfromafar 63d ago
Could these choices have anything to with the alleged focus on Compute Module and less focus on the "normal" Raspberry? Does anyone know?
[−] jacquesm 63d ago
[flagged]
[−] poppafuze 63d ago
The first rule of bringup is thermal support.
[−] moffkalast 63d ago
Just another Raspberry Pi HAT ;)
[−] anesxvito 63d ago
[flagged]
[−] Western0 62d ago
great