Bets on US-Iran ceasefire show signs of insider knowledge, say experts (theguardian.com)

by trocado 184 comments 193 points
Read article View on HN

184 comments

[−] mikkupikku 53d ago
If the administration decides to end this stupid war just so they can cash out some profitable bets... I don't even know what I would think. The whole thing is so stupid it makes my head hurt.
[−] delecti 53d ago
I think the main reason is that they were all too incompetent to realize what the effects of the war would be on the global financial system. The bets were probably just a happy opportunity for corruption.

> The whole thing is so stupid it makes my head hurt

Look on the bright side, at least the malicious actors aren't able to competently implement their goals.

[−] colechristensen 53d ago
The economic effects impact the rest of the world much more than the US, which may have been somebody's planning point, although on the surface they seem to be too stupid to come up with this idea.

The US/North America is petroleum-product-independent-ish. We produce approximately as much hydrocarbons as we use. We also could produce a lot more but tar sands, shale oil, etc. are more expensive to produce and not very profitable at $60/bbl but it's there ready for the taking. When you're talking about how we aren't it's about how certain refineries are tuned for which type of oil and how we import unrefined and export the refined products, etc... but we're not RUNNING OUT of oil or energy.

Many places in the rest of the world aren't like that and will suffer much greater losses while the US is relatively strong. Of course we're all linked, but a power hungry dictator might only really care who's on top in a relative sense even if everybody is dragged down.

[−] huijzer 53d ago
When do we cross the barrier from incompetent to nefarious?
[−] red-iron-pine 53d ago
their goal is to tank the market, make fast stacks of $$$, and then buy up everything.

this isn't new, the techo-feudalism has been pretty clear since Thiel got his man (JD Vance) into the VP slot.

the Israelis also figure he's probably not gonna last through the mid-terms, so they want the US to do their dirty work while they still have leverage over him via Epstein files. Russia wants the US to get into a similar long-slog war, and is desperate for high oil prices.

[−] jmyeet 53d ago
It's not really up to the US and Israel when this war of choice ends anymore. It's up to Iran. And Iran, justifiably, is going to demand their pound of flesh. That could require some combination of ending the (criminal) sanctions, de-militarizing the Gulf and reining in Israel.

The problem is all of these things are politically untenable. This is the only reason why I think this war could continue long term because Trump simply cannot back down.

I think the recession from this could actually get so bad that there's now a nonzero (but still small) chance Trump gets removed from office, either by impeachment or by being 25A'ed.

It is hard to adequately state what a geopolitical disaster this was and it is I think quite easily the biggest mistake by an administration in the entire history of the US. I'm not exaggerating.

[−] netsharc 53d ago
Isn't the problem that they can't end the war unilaterally? The Iranian regime is justifiably pissed off and is still flinging drones and rockets towards any viable target, and any ceasefire will be with acceptance of their terms. The Trump/Netanyahu collection of dumb ego won't be able to accept being dictated terms.

So like in Game of Thrones, we hope a Jamie Lannister shows up...

[−] Aurornis 53d ago
The bet amounts are small relative to the political scandal that would follow top administration officials who have decision making power.

If there is insider trading it's most likely low-level staffers or friends of officials who speak too freely.

If a high ranking official wanted to make a lot of money on these moves in an untraceable way, there are numerous financial market opportunities. The amount they could make on betting markets is peanuts and too easily tracked.

[−] gos9 53d ago
You think polymarket is where this game is being played? For a couple hundred thousand dollars?

Since when do profoundly stupid people use this site?

[−] parsimo2010 53d ago
The article isn’t implying that Trump is going to seek a ceasefire because of some puny bets on Polymarket, it’s implying that someone (or multiple people) close to Trump heard he was considering a ceasefire and placed a bet before Trump posted about it and the odds went up. Or they at least knew that him posting about it would affect the ours enough to make money, whether he plans to negotiate a ceasefire for real.
[−] xg15 53d ago
That would be darkly hilarious, but I think it could also be the opposite way around: That there is a ceasefire shaping up, and some of Trump's staffers couldn't hold it anymore and placed bets using their knowledge - therefore accidentally "leaking" the plans.

At least I'm having my hopes up for this.

[−] wetpaws 53d ago
[dead]
[−] varispeed 53d ago
[flagged]
[−] coevcan 53d ago
Are you really going to suggest trump cares about an $820k bet? He doesn't even care to collect his presidential salary.

I'm sure he exaggerates his wealth, but we know he's at least a billionaire.

[−] irishcoffee 53d ago
The amount of money to be made on these markets is in the tens of millions at best. This administration doesn’t care about that. I understand why you feel that way, the numbers are just too inconsequential to even move the needle.

Bit players with knowledge that have been perennially underpaid by the us govt. however, mortgage-saving money. I don’t blame them. Do you?

“I’m aware of a big decision and I can make 23k off of it, probably.” Do it up, congress has been living off insider trading for a century, let the little guy get theirs.

Until gambling commercials are banned in the same way cigarette commercials were banned, we’re all just yelling at the wind.

[−] broof 53d ago
Isn’t one of the points of betting markets is to incentivize this? Now me, as someone who doesn’t have access to insider knowledge, can know that there’s a noticeably increased chance of what’s going to happen. I do think maybe there should be some sort of feature to prevent last minute bets that utilizes insider knowledge, and I do admit there are considerable negative externalities to this system but it’s not clear to me that this is for sure bad.
[−] Karrot_Kream 53d ago
Couldn't insiders just trade Brent Crude futures and do the same thing? There's more than enough liquidity in Brent that an insider can make great money.