OpenAI's latest repo has Claude as the third top contributor (twitter.com)

by mirzap 25 comments 59 points
Read article View on HN

25 comments

[−] devin 52d ago
Claude's contribution is 2 commits adding 4500 lines and removing 0.

I don't think people understand what this repo even is.

Claude's contribution is not significant any way you slice it.

Go look at the other users who are committers. There are giant logfiles. Other committers are +28,000 LOC on 2 commits.

Here's an example commit from another user: https://github.com/openai/parameter-golf/commit/985568880b60...

[−] Aurornis 52d ago
This repo is for a competition where they accept user-contributed code.

Everyone reading the Tweet or headline has incorrectly assumed that OpenAI employees were using Claude.

This is a perfect example of why you should always read past the headline or tweet at least a little bit.

[−] andito 52d ago
I'm pretty sure they scrubbed the commit history to remove claude. Github caches the top contributors in the main page so even if you rewrite the history they remain. And in this repo you're right that if you go to the history claude's contribution shouldn't get it so high, so it follows that they scrubbed it.
[−] moralestapia 52d ago
Yeah, that's a great analysis you put together.

This is a company aiming for a trillion dollar public valuation, mostly built brand on and hype.

This tweet has been seen 100k times so far, plus it reached the front page of HN.

One would think they would be much more careful with their brand.

[−] arjie 52d ago
* Having Claude add itself as co-author is a pretty smart marketing move.

* I have more respect for organizations that are willing to use competitor tools where necessary.

They should definitely be modifying Codex's commit messages to be similar.

[−] Aurornis 52d ago

> * I have more respect for organizations that are willing to use competitor tools where necessary.

This repo is for an open competition. They accept PR submissions. The Claude submissions presumably didn’t come from OpenAI employees.

[−] arjie 52d ago
Ah, thanks for that. Changes the story. So that leaves Meta as the only AI lab known to use a competitor lab's (Claude) products extensively.
[−] Growtika 52d ago
This feels like one of those stories that spreads because it’s too good not to.

People see that Claude is a top contributor in OpenAI related repo and jump to conclusions about what it means

Same with the Ballmer/Mac story. It sort of happened, but not really how people tell it. The Mac was there, but he wasn’t actually using it the way the story implies.

https://www.engadget.com/2008-04-30-steve-ballmer-uses-a-mac...

[−] sabareesh 52d ago
Codex usually dont add itself as contributor so this is misleading .
[−] taspeotis 52d ago

    OpenAI's latest repo has Claude as the third top contributor (twitter.com/codebynz)
    13 points by mirzap 19 minutes ago | flag | hide | past | favorite | 2 comments
#9 here?

https://github.com/openai/parameter-golf/graphs/contributors

[−] aubanel 52d ago
This tweet was just reusing an earlier tweet (same image) without attribution : https://x.com/andimarafioti/status/2036107240420032874

Update the link if possible?

[−] aestrad7 52d ago
Lol, Claude Code genuinely is the best coding assistant as a product regardless of underlying model
[−] Aurornis 52d ago
They’re running an open competition. They merge user-contributed submissions into the repo. Claude was attributed for 2 of them.

This is a huge nothingburger.

[−] Tiberium 52d ago
The only top comment in the thread that actually read past the title..
[−] datadrivenangel 52d ago
Claude code is impressively good. Some of the other models and harnesses get close, but it's a noticeable regression when I hit a limit and move to kilocode with gpt-oss:120b running locally.
[−] messh 52d ago
but if you move to gpt-5.4 ?
[−] georaa 52d ago
[flagged]