UK total wind generation record beaten today (renewables-map.robinhawkes.com)

by martinald 33 comments 57 points
Read article View on HN

33 comments

[−] robhawkes 51d ago
Oh cool, that's my website! Let me know if you have any questions about it and I'll do my best to answer them.
[−] countrymile 51d ago
Great website! Can you describe the potential output? There is a little i sign but I can't click it on Firefox mobile.
[−] robhawkes 51d ago
Indeed! That's including available wind generation that was curtailed (not used) due to transmission constraints. So it's the actual output plus the amount of output that was "lost" because we had to switch off some wind farms, even though the wind was there to generate more.
[−] ZeroGravitas 51d ago
Apparently they've announced some plan to sell this power cheaply to local people on the same side of the bottleneck, though I've not seen the details yet.

Seems to be another one of those sensible ideas that needs a global crisis to be pushed through to reality.

[−] mcrmonkey 51d ago
Excellent Site!

What are the lines that cross Scotland ? At time of writing they are red where as other lines further south are green.

I know of some on shore wind up near the Rochdale area too. Does it mean they are offline if they just appear as black dots on the map?

[−] nhecker 51d ago
(edit: I see you answered a sibling comment with the same question. TL;DR: Potential output is the output pretending that curtailment did not apply. Thanks!)

A UI or terminology question: when 'Potential output' says it is 'Including curtailment', does this mean that it pretends that curtailment doesn't apply, or that it subtracts the curtailed power from the total available so that the total power shown is only the power actually transmitted (exported) to the grid? It's very likely that I'm just not familiar enough with the terms, but this wasn't immediately clear. My guess is the former meaning, although I can imagine it meaning either.

Regardless, this is incredibly neat, and I'd love to see this kind of data for the grid that serves me (Eastern Interconnect in the US) -- are you aware of any sites similar?

[−] nasretdinov 51d ago
I must say it was quite windy for the last couple of days. When I say "quite windy" I mean I saw people saying they were blown off their bike :)
[−] turkeywelder 51d ago
Love your stuff Robin. The graphs and wind turbine model are particular favourites

How can we fix the curtailment problem? Storage nearer the turbines or just more transmission capacity generally? I presume we'd saturate storage pretty quickly so is it just a case of running more grid wiring from Scotland to say.. Manchester?

[−] deterministic 51d ago
Great website! It would be even more great if it compared total wind generation with total UK power usage for the same time period (with a % for wind power usage).
[−] gotwaz 52d ago
Some context would make it more interesting. How much of it was used? How much does wind contribute to full day consumption?
[−] toomuchtodo 51d ago
Not to steal from Robin's excellent work, you can see how much it's been (low carbon/renewables generation) over the last twelve months at https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/GB/12mo/monthly (~56% renewables, ~73% low carbon)

(Robin, if there is a way to see this on your site, I could not find it, my apologies!)

[−] robhawkes 51d ago
Not at all, my stuff is very niche and the other websites and dashboards do a much better job at filling in the higher-level context.
[−] wiredfool 51d ago
In Ireland, we’re running at about 75% renewables for the day, with most of that being wind. The absolute numbers are smaller, but that’s a peak of about 500 MW of solar and 3.6GW of wind, against something like 5-6Gw of demand.
[−] ortusdux 51d ago
[−] plodman 51d ago
And yet we’re about to face an eye watering increase in bills due to the way we’re charged for energy.
[−] Sarkie 51d ago
Congrats Robin.
[−] robhawkes 51d ago
Thanks! Always a surprise and a pleasure seeing my stuff on here