ICAO issued new power bank restriction on flight (icao.int)

by phantomathkg 183 comments 95 points
Read article View on HN

183 comments

[−] broadsidepicnic 48d ago
Pilot here.

While I definitely approve this and consider the limit to be one too many, I wish ecigarettes would be rather the target as soon as possible. Those are dangerous, and lately the most potential culprit for lithium related problems aboard.

[−] tadfisher 48d ago
That is surprising to me, considering the sheer number of phones/tablets/laptops on every flight. Does anyone maintain a list of incidents?
[−] KennyBlanken 48d ago
Phones, tablets, and laptops are not sold in bodegas, designed to be disposable, and thus made as incredibly cheaply as possible.

The high end vapes use huge amounts of current to the point that vape users will specifically seek unprotected cells because the protection circuitry adds a slight bit of internal resistance.

So then the unprotected cells can then short out in their bags or otherwise be damaged and fail when the vape electronics fail...

[−] cosmic_cheese 48d ago
I think many don't appreciate just how horrifically cheap and dangerous some of this stuff is. Not just vapes, but things like charging bricks too.

I'm generally not a proponent of draconian regulation but I firmly believe that any electronics handling substantial voltage not approved by UL or similar should be rejected at the border. It's all dangerous and incentive to manufacture it needs to be curbed.

[−] john01dav 46d ago
I have seen things approved by those sort of organizations that were extremely dangerous, such as a listed fire alarm that when installed has a significant chance of becoming silently deactivated.

With that said, it can be even worse when it isn't listed.

[−] baby_souffle 48d ago
I can't imagine that the QA process for vapes is better than even the _super_ budget tablet or phone, though.
[−] sealeck 48d ago
Surely the other way around? Phone QA process >>> disposable vape QA process...
[−] arianvanp 48d ago
E cigarettes work by shorting the battery releasing a lot of instantenous heat. Their safety controller firmware are often of ... Dubious quality. It can happen quite often that the cigarette doesn't stop shorting the battery and catch fire as a result.

Making fire is literally their function unlike a laptop.

Combine that with basically unregulated and semi illegal supply chain and it becomes a recipe for disaster

[−] ghighi7878 48d ago
A large portion of this can be avoided if arplanes just exposed a power slot in entry row like is standard in long haul flights
[−] snops 48d ago
Many airlines are going much further than this, for instance Virgin Atlantic ban you from either charging or charging from any power bank, and you can't keep them in the overhead locker, you must keep them next to you in case it starts burning spontaneously!

They have a "fire containment bag" they can chuck it in should you notice it getting hot or smoking.

https://www.virginatlantic.com/en-US/help/articles/powerbank...

[−] Liftyee 48d ago
Interesting... anyone know if they've released the rationale/data behind this? I could see a few reasons why power banks present a larger risk than phones/computers (battery capacity, quality control), but it seems like the 100Wh battery limit already covers one of these.

In a similar vein, China banned non-CCC certified (the equivalent to UL or CE) power banks on flights from 2025, which seems to be targeting the quality control side of the problem. Not just on paper - the security officers inspected every lithium battery I was carrying, even the one in my flashlight.

[−] aftbit 48d ago
I bring a single high-quality large power bank whenever I travel. It's hard to reliably find power for my phone, laptop, e-reader, earbuds, gamma spectrometer, flashlight, etc while in the airport or in flight. Not every plane I end up on has reliable USB chargers. Sometimes it's handy to just plug my devices in while they're in my bag.
[−] Scoundreller 48d ago
I wouldn’t bring a power bank if the usb-a ports on most aircraft could just put out more than a measly 500ma.
[−] perching_aix 48d ago
Fingers crossed the Donut Lab solid state battery ends up being the real deal, lives up to the hype, and this sillyness can finally go away. Recent tests look promising from a (lack of a) thermal runaway standpoint at least.

The only question is if the rules will mind the difference in battery composition and chemistry.

[−] nharada 48d ago
Was expecting to be annoyed but this seems reasonable. You can have 2 power banks and can't charge them during flight
[−] quantummagic 48d ago
Limiting the devices to two per person seems nonsensical to me. The devices are either dangerous, or they're not. If they're dangerous, two is too many. And if they're not, then why limit them only to two?
[−] baggy_trough 48d ago
I couldn't find the actual regulation. What counts as a "power bank"? I travel with a bunch of GoPro batteries, but they are smaller.
[−] snowchaser 47d ago
I just use my laptop as a powerbank these days. What I typically need to charge is a phone, with way smaller capacity than my macbook. So it works pretty well now that everything has usbc.
[−] eqvinox 48d ago
Content nonwithstanding, announcing rule changes like this with immediately taking effect is just shoddy practice. At least give travellers a few weeks of heads-up.
[−] rootusrootus 48d ago
Seems reasonable enough, though it will require a little extra work if you're the designated battery-carrier when your family flies somewhere.
[−] amelius 48d ago
Just give us internet free of extra charge.
[−] aitchnyu 48d ago
Umm, did they mention the Joules (mAh) limit and combustibility?
[−] jeremie_strand 48d ago
[dead]
[−] brcmthrowaway 48d ago
Can a battery be built up the same way as DRAM? Why are we using weird chemicals?
[−] longislandguido 48d ago
Power banks were a mistake. It's akin to carrying fireworks in your bag. Ban them all from air travel.

Every one I have owned has been recalled for being a fire hazard. EVERY SINGLE ONE. I stopped buying them as a result. We're talking name brand devices, not junk off AliExpress.

[−] flower-giraffe 48d ago
That is actually included in the amendment, the should seem to be a softening to allow for airline discretion for medical devices etc.

ICAO Technical Instructions (Part 8, Table 8-1 amendment):

“Spare batteries, including power banks: must not be recharged on board the aircraft; should not be used to charge portable electronic devices on board the aircraft; the number carried is limited to a maximum of two per person.”