MiniStack (replacement for LocalStack) (ministack.org)

by kerblang 67 comments 317 points
Read article View on HN

67 comments

[−] philip1209 45d ago
I'm frustrated with the Localstack license changes and will evaluate ministack.

But, for anybody else who needs a quick fix - you can pin to the community-archive tag and it should unblock you quickly:

https://hub.docker.com/layers/localstack/localstack/communit...

[−] arpinum 45d ago
I have detailed knowledge of dynamodb. This code does not properly mimic the service exceptions, input validations, eventual consistency, or edge cases. I would not feel comfortable developing against ministack or running tests against it. A lot of these services also have free tiers, so the use cases are quite minimal.
[−] staticassertion 45d ago
I really don't see how any clone is going to manage to do what localstack couldn't - maintain compatibility with tons of AWS services while not getting paid for it. If this were viable, why would it not have worked before?

The only things I can think of are that perhaps LocalStack was just a mess of a codebase that couldn't maintain velocity or attract contributors, or it just failed to steward new contributors or some such thing.

[−] robshippr 45d ago
The real issue with LocalStack was always drift. Tests pass locally, then something breaks in staging because the S3 response format is slightly different or DynamoDB throttling doesn't match. After getting burned enough times we just switched to short-lived real AWS environments for integration tests. More expensive, but way fewer surprises in prod.
[−] giobox 45d ago
Ugh, I hadn't heard the news about the LocalStack licensing changes. I had some great results building AWS services for local dev as well as CI/CD and testing in GH actions with LocalStack in previous jobs.

I secretly always hoped Amazon would buy out LocalStack and make it the official free local development environment for AWS work, but I guess it probably would reduce revenues spent on AWS based dev and test environments. The compatibility with the AWS CLI was mostly excellent in my experiences.

[−] oefrha 45d ago
Any project with Claude’s signature misaligned ASCII diagram just screams DON’T USE to me. If you can’t even bother to read your damn generated README, how do I know you have QC’ed anything else? At the very least supported features claimed in README / on website could be totally fake, which is extremely common among all the vibed Show HNs.

https://github.com/Nahuel990/ministack/blob/a1b1d20a27d2238d...

[−] mikecarlton 45d ago
Another alternative, earlier on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47420619
[−] techwithprateek 44d ago
I think it's still very early for this to be adapted in the SDLC, but looks very promising. I am frustrated with Localstack at this point, and this may just do the job.
[−] threethirtytwo 45d ago
What’s the gcp equivalent
[−] opengrass 44d ago
FR: real cost simulator
[−] kay_o 45d ago

> Copyright (c) 2024 MiniStack Contributors

Already lying or totally unreviewed AI slop ?

[−] shantnutiwari 44d ago
As other commenters have noted, this looks like AI slop. Why is it on the front page?

If you go on Reddit, there are at least a dozen AI "vibe coded" shitty local stack alternatives being posted daily. Whats special about this??

[−] lucas_vieira 39d ago
[dead]
[−] tomerbd 44d ago
[dead]
[−] weiyong1024 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] GRACE44 38d ago
[dead]
[−] redlewel 45d ago
[dead]
[−] SophieVeldman 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] volume_tech 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] steffs 44d ago
[flagged]