U.S. exempts oil industry from protecting Gulf animals, for 'national security' (npr.org)

by Jimmc414 115 comments 265 points
Read article View on HN

115 comments

[−] 0xbadcafebee 45d ago
Of the 13 billion barrels of oil the US produces every day, 1.5 billion (15%) comes from the gulf. Despite this being more than enough oil (we are a net-exporter of oil), we import crude oil because our refineries need a different type of crude. The extra 15% of oil we are killing the environment over is for making a profit to export to other nations. It is not for national security.
[−] stingraycharles 45d ago
Guess which nation also has this heavy type of crude oil? Venezuela, which was invaded earlier this year.

If I recall correctly, the US used to have more of this type of oil, that depleted, so now they still have all the refineries on the east coast and need to import it.

[−] reenorap 45d ago
It's millions of barrels per day not billions.
[−] 0xbadcafebee 44d ago
you're right, brain fart
[−] unethical_ban 45d ago
BILLION? My god, I didn't know we produced that much.

I've known for a while that our refineries are tuned to lighter "sweet crude" than what Canada or US produces, and long have I thought that a more benevolent, heavy-handed government should incentivize our domestic industry to handle our own oil for national security.

[−] stingraycharles 45d ago
From what I understand, the US currently produces more oil than any other country has ever produced.
[−] Henchman21 44d ago
Its what moves the biggest military the world has ever seen
[−] 0xbadcafebee 45d ago
2028: "To be secure as a nation we need to stamp out all dissent against the government and require all citizens to swear unyielding loyalty to the President."
[−] kingkawn 45d ago
This is 100% coming barring a mass political rising
[−] 0xbadcafebee 44d ago
yep. Tried to overthrow the government once already, with no consequence, so there's no reason not to try it again. This time he's way more entrenched/powerful. He & VP have said multiple times they want to remove all govt workers who aren't "their people", which would make a 1-Party state, aka authoritarian regime. Culmination of Project 2025 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025#Allegations_of_au...).

We're going to lose Iran war, which will put more pressure on "national security" & economy. That'll dovetail into 2028 elections. So he'll start a new war, claim there are extremists at home, start martial law, refuse to leave office. When that happens, same things that happen in every authoritarian regime will start. He's said publicly he wants to jail his enemies and curtail rights like free speech and journalism. It'll be extended into more fearmongering about minority groups to galvanize the base. Those big detention camps will get a lot bigger. Economy will be in the shitter, but that's fine, just blame it on "enemies", talk about "empire", and start a world war. Draft comes back, suddenly you have a huge infantry, lots of factory workers, staffed largely by political enemies.

[−] wise_young_man 45d ago
If AI takes all the jobs and consolidation of wealth continues it’s not an unlikely outcome. No income no spending = dead economy, poverty and starvation.

What are do people do when their government and capitalism fails them?

[−] Gud 45d ago
AI will perhaps take “all the jobs” in a far distant future.

Hopefully by then humanity has managed to get educated and learned to cooperate and share.

[−] Hasslequest 45d ago
It doesn't have to take all the jobs. If it can take most of the fake jobs we've invented over the years, it will be massively destructive to our way of life. It seems to already have that level of capability.

Funny that you assume education will lead to some sort of egalitarian society. What do you think the point of modern education is? We all take the course in evolution and natural selection, whether we want to or not. We all study history. We all fraternize and learn the little political games or we drop out. Some of us recieve a degree in hard knocks. Why shouldn't the educated be more cutthroat than the rest of us?

[−] Gud 44d ago
I didn’t make the point that education automatically leads to an egalitarian society.

I made the point that humans can be educated to care for one another(indoctrination if you will).

[−] creationcomplex 45d ago
Start a war. Call dissent treason. Crush the left.

Capitalism falls back to fascism to protect wealth, time and time again.

[−] CGMthrowaway 44d ago
[flagged]
[−] Sabinus 44d ago
I don't understand why this conspiratorial belief has persisted. The restrictions ended. They happened worldwide. They were clearly for the safety of the public and the functioning of the health system during a novel virus epidemic.
[−] 0xbadcafebee 44d ago
Why'd you leave out the "to prevent millions of deaths" part?
[−] arnonymous 44d ago
Except that was actually the policy all around the world and not unique to the US administration at the time. So not sure what your point is, time to move on...
[−] datsci_est_2015 44d ago
What is the purpose of this comment? Genuinely trying to understand.
[−] alanwreath 45d ago
Wasn’t diversifying US energy sources also a national security issue? And wind energy was set aside because, wait for it, they killed animals. Birds to be specific.
[−] helterskelter 45d ago
Remember when we destroyed Iran's nuclear program before we destroyed it last month? This administration is perfectly consistent with being inconsistent.
[−] chao- 45d ago
I'm not sure about all wind energy, but offshore wind energy has been set aside because Donald Trump's Scotland Golf Club lost a lawsuit to an offshore wind farm a decade ago, and he appears to have a blanket opposition to the concept ever since.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_International_Golf_Club_...

(personal commentary/context: I want more energy production of any economically viable category: wind, solar, nuclear, geothermal, natural gas, etc. I have no blanket opposition to offshore oil drilling or offshore wind energy)

[−] pseudohadamard 44d ago
"National security issue" is the root password to the constitution and the rule of law. It'll get used whenever someone wants to bypass either or both.
[−] Glyptodon 45d ago
The folks in charge just want what they want without rhyme or reason. Mix a mind virus and joy of power together and get your eratic clown show. And many times it can go on a lot longer than you'd ever guess.

Unfortunately as a society we keep moving further and further away from the foundations of a functional society based on a representative government and considering the general welfare.

[−] linkjuice4all 45d ago
The rhyme and the reason are pretty much this:

- I was able to make money off of this

- This pissed off the people I don’t like

None of this should come as a surprise. The scoundrels got the mob in power (again) and they’re just going to keep breaking things and stealing the money until stopped or dead.

[−] unethical_ban 45d ago
The optimist in me thinks we will pivot from this dark timeline in 10-20 years. That even if we face violent internal strife, we will come out of this dark timeline eventually. Even the threat of omniscient AI surveillance is too much against the will of a free society.

I hope.

[−] xnx 43d ago
Reminder that cats and buildings kill more birds than windmills.
[−] steve-atx-7600 45d ago
That’s not the point. The point is if you lose a presidential election to a grifter, most folks are screwed in almost unlimited ways. Don’t lose an election to a grifter. Be more practical when it comes to not losing an election to a grifter next time.
[−] atmavatar 45d ago
The way you phrase all that underscores the real problem: no one holds the Republican party accountable for their actions. It's the Democrats' responsibility to save us from them, and when the public screws up and grants power to the Republicans again, it's the Democrats' fault and not those who voted in the goons who come in and break things.

The Democrats are hardly perfect, and I wish we had something better to oppose the Republicans, but let's at least acknowledge who the real villain is.

[−] arjie 45d ago
The thing says they can now dispose of trash and do loud things in the Gulf of Mexico (America haha). But what does that actually get us?

Googling and LLMing around it allows normal sea operations in the Gulf so drilling is possible etc. Interesting. So they’re going to try to get more oil out of there?

Can’t say I trust their competence very much here. It’s more likely to be a carve out for a friend than anything else and I’m pretty pro deregulation in general.

[−] SilverElfin 45d ago
Note that they also increased the limit on Ethanol. Now, E15 is legal (instead of E10), again in the interest of “national security”.

https://www.thedrive.com/news/the-feds-plan-to-start-dilutin...

[−] ZunarJ5 45d ago
"Definitive of what capitalism is, this separation severely limits the scope of the political. Devolving vast aspects of social life to the rule of “the market” (in reality, to large corporations), it declares them off-limits to democratic decision-making, collective action, and public control. Its very structure, therefore, deprives us of the ability to decide collectively exactly what and how much we want to produce, on what energic basis and through what kinds of social relations. It deprives us, too, of the capacity to determine how we want to use the social surplus we collectively produce; how we want to relate to nature and to future generations; how we want to organize the work of social reproduction and its relation to that of production. Capitalism, in sum, is fundamentally anti-democratic. Even in the best-case scenario, democracy in a capitalist society must perforce be limited and weak."

https://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/publications/centerpiece/fall2...

[−] whalesalad 45d ago
I always thought Trump was such a joke. Completely non-threatening, just a big personality who kept popping up here and there. I even bought a MAGA hat back in the summer before the election explicitly because I thought it was hysterical he was even running, and knew he would lose. I thought the whole thing was a gag, a joke, just like Bloomberg. It didn't even cross my mind that someone so woefully inadequate for the position, so abrasive, so criminal, so disgusting -- could ever get elected to the presidency. In the grand scheme of the universe, he was a nobody. His name would have died with him.

Boy was I wrong. His name will be studied for decades to come in all the worst ways.

[−] comfysocks 44d ago
Yes, but this is for national (midterm election) security, so we need gas prices down before November.
[−] nunez 44d ago
I wonder how much the current conflict with the Strait of Hormuz [^0] had to do with this terrifying decision.

[^0] https://old.reddit.com/r/energy/comments/1s8u2ho/trump_says_...

[−] gpi 45d ago
They called the committee god squad?
[−] bl4kers 45d ago
Fishermen in the gulf were already struggling. Seems like a death knell to that industry
[−] crooked-v 45d ago
Oppositional defiant disorder on a cultural scale. Liberals want to protect animals and shift to use of green energy; therefore the fossil fuel industry must be promoted at all cost (even when they don't want to be, as with Trump forcing obsolete coal plants to remain open) and endangered animals must be killed off.
[−] tsoukase 44d ago
Now it's evident that a Rep POTUS mainly surrenders to the military/oil regime while a Dem to the banks/funds one. Tech and movie industry usually follow and adapt to the leader.
[−] kaycey2022 44d ago
[dead]
[−] dboreham 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] crimshawz 45d ago
[dead]
[−] cynicalsecurity 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] mrcwinn 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] nba456_ 45d ago
[flagged]
[−] Mistletoe 45d ago
Don’t say US. They don’t speak for us all. Only 49.8% of voters. Of which I hope a significant portion have seen the error of their ways come midterms and the next election.

Every day is a new embarrassment law or action like this for America until then. I’ve never felt lower about America in my lifetime. The hope I had, the pride I felt in America, is gone, chunk by chunk, piece by piece, every day.