The respondent did not show up to the hearing. They also did not show up to the gun relinquishment hearing, where it was noted they have approached another VC firm with a firearm before being apprehended by the police.
The san mateo prosecutor's office was notified of non-compliance.
This seems unlikely to have any sort of happy ending.
It seems like some people are trying to portray him as something he’s not.
He has been focused on building startups since arriving in Silicon Valley and has created multiple products over the years. That track record speaks more clearly than speculative claims.
The claim that he approached another VC firm is incorrect.
He was invited to the location via text message, where the founder encouraged him to apply and be accepted into their accelerator program. Upon arrival, the situation became uncomfortable, with individuals attempting to intimidate and surround him.
There is a growing concern among founders about how ideas are handled in these environments, and situations like this only reinforce those concerns.
It’s important not to misrepresent what actually happened.
From what I understand, no firearm was involved in this situation. When the individual arrived, he asked to pitch, and shortly after, staff/security asked him to leave.
The founder shared his story and recorded video at the time. This founder has also built a 3D printer and developed several other projects.
There may be additional context from law enforcement as well, but it’s important to rely on verified information rather than assumptions.
I’ve been on this earth for a few days. Something tells me there is probably a better word than “founder” that could be used to describe this guy if legal action is being taken against him
Looks like this guy tried to brandish a firearm while attempting to meet with the plaintiff, a restraining order seems very reasonable given the circumstances.
26 comments
https://web.sanmateocourt.org/midx/
Search for 26-CIV-00518
Deep link to the petition/complaint PDF: https://tinyurl.com/32xj5djy
(The details are the last page)
The respondent did not show up to the hearing. They also did not show up to the gun relinquishment hearing, where it was noted they have approached another VC firm with a firearm before being apprehended by the police. The san mateo prosecutor's office was notified of non-compliance.
This seems unlikely to have any sort of happy ending.
He has been focused on building startups since arriving in Silicon Valley and has created multiple products over the years. That track record speaks more clearly than speculative claims.
He was invited to the location via text message, where the founder encouraged him to apply and be accepted into their accelerator program. Upon arrival, the situation became uncomfortable, with individuals attempting to intimidate and surround him.
There is a growing concern among founders about how ideas are handled in these environments, and situations like this only reinforce those concerns.
It’s important not to misrepresent what actually happened.
I don't know what happened but the last paragraph of the complaint says he approached another firm, became aggressive, and pulled out a firearm.
There isn't a transcript of the hearing itself or other affidavits that give a different pov like you are giving.
He also did not show up to the hearing or send a lawyer to present an alternative view or set of evidence.
At that point it becomes an accepted set of uncontested facts (legally, i mean)
The founder shared his story and recorded video at the time. This founder has also built a 3D printer and developed several other projects.
There may be additional context from law enforcement as well, but it’s important to rely on verified information rather than assumptions.
Dulat, is that you?