A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted] (trellis.law)

by elonmm 26 comments 12 points
Read article View on HN

26 comments

[−] DannyBee 43d ago
To access the actual docs, go here:

https://web.sanmateocourt.org/midx/

Search for 26-CIV-00518

Deep link to the petition/complaint PDF: https://tinyurl.com/32xj5djy

(The details are the last page)

The respondent did not show up to the hearing. They also did not show up to the gun relinquishment hearing, where it was noted they have approached another VC firm with a firearm before being apprehended by the police. The san mateo prosecutor's office was notified of non-compliance.

This seems unlikely to have any sort of happy ending.

[−] IAmBroom 43d ago
"Approached with a firearm" is wildly different from "tried to pitch". This is a ridiculously slanted headline.
[−] jacquesm 43d ago
Thanks, that's a much better link. That original submitted link is garbage.
[−] elonmm 43d ago
The claim that he approached another VC firm is incorrect.

He was invited to the location via text message, where the founder encouraged him to apply and be accepted into their accelerator program. Upon arrival, the situation became uncomfortable, with individuals attempting to intimidate and surround him.

There is a growing concern among founders about how ideas are handled in these environments, and situations like this only reinforce those concerns.

It’s important not to misrepresent what actually happened.

[−] elonmm 43d ago
[dead]
[−] elonmm 35d ago
[dead]
[−] aduwah 43d ago
Can't wait for his LinkedIn post.
[−] elonmm 43d ago
From what I understand, no firearm was involved in this situation. When the individual arrived, he asked to pitch, and shortly after, staff/security asked him to leave.

The founder shared his story and recorded video at the time. This founder has also built a 3D printer and developed several other projects.

There may be additional context from law enforcement as well, but it’s important to rely on verified information rather than assumptions.

[−] kleiba 43d ago
Not enough information here to make informed comments.
[−] welcome_dragon 43d ago
The only useful bit I can get from that incredibly ugly/spammy site is that the restraining order referenced "workplace violence"
[−] IAmBroom 43d ago
Interesting that OP's only other submission is identical, with a post assuring us "this is a truth".

Dulat, is that you?

[−] justonceokay 43d ago
I’ve been on this earth for a few days. Something tells me there is probably a better word than “founder” that could be used to describe this guy if legal action is being taken against him
[−] CodingJeebus 43d ago
Looks like this guy tried to brandish a firearm while attempting to meet with the plaintiff, a restraining order seems very reasonable given the circumstances.
[−] elonmm 42d ago
I think it's security stuff decided to scam, by youself a16z team don't know what happened, but they have cameras
[−] ruined 43d ago
any chance you've got a link with, like, stuff in it?
[−] OutOfHere 43d ago
It is not too clear if he had an appointment or not.
[−] Herod55 38d ago
[dead]
[−] Danuser 38d ago
[dead]
[−] Herod55 38d ago
[dead]
[−] GoodUser77 43d ago
[dead]
[−] opengrass 43d ago
[flagged]
[−] elonmm 43d ago
[flagged]
[−] elonmm 35d ago
[dead]