Author here. We were analyzing a compromised contributor account targeting better-auth when we noticed something interesting about the attack vector. Most coverage of supply chain attacks focuses on the "what happened" but I wanted to document the "how it actually works" with the deobfuscated code.
Wwo things stood out:
1. hiding the payload in next.config.mjs is clever because GitHub's UI truncates long lines so the malicious string is literally invisible when scrolling through the file. second, storing the c2 payload on binance smart chain means theres no server to take down. The axios attack was mitigated by removing the GitHub-hosted payload. This one can't be.
2. found 30+ repos with the same signature string. Pretty sure there's way more we didn't catch with basic string matching.
happy to answer questions about the deobfuscation process or the c2 protocol analysis.
12 comments
Wwo things stood out: 1. hiding the payload in next.config.mjs is clever because GitHub's UI truncates long lines so the malicious string is literally invisible when scrolling through the file. second, storing the c2 payload on binance smart chain means theres no server to take down. The axios attack was mitigated by removing the GitHub-hosted payload. This one can't be.
2. found 30+ repos with the same signature string. Pretty sure there's way more we didn't catch with basic string matching.
happy to answer questions about the deobfuscation process or the c2 protocol analysis.