Metro stop is Ancient Rome's new attraction (bbc.com)

by Stevvo 40 comments 119 points
Read article View on HN

40 comments

[−] rsynnott 30d ago

> When most cities build metro systems, they simply blast through rock.

I'm not sure that this is true (ignoring the bit about blasting, which hasn't been a standard way to build metro lines for a very long time, of course); there was a lot found when London's Crossrail was built, say.

(While it's not made totally clear, I assume they're mostly finding stuff building stations, not tunnels. The tunnels are ~20m below ground, but the stations have to go all the way to the surface.)

Really, any old city, anytime you build anything you may find something. For instance, here's a supermarket with bonus Viking ruins in Dublin: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/aungier-street-lidl-arch...

[−] JonSchneider 30d ago

> (While it's not made totally clear, I assume they're mostly finding stuff building stations, not tunnels. The tunnels are ~20m below ground, but the stations have to go all the way to the surface.)

This is exactly right. Rome's subway is famously dug very deep (30-80 meters) so the tunnels run under the ruins, but each station requires an excavation down to tunnel depth.

[−] bombcar 30d ago
Blasting through rock is expensive and only done if needed - I'd suspect that most projects now are cut and cover or tunnel boring machine - both of which can also be terribly expensive (see: Seattle).
[−] ianburrell 29d ago
Blasting through hard rock is easy. Finland has perfect rock and makes lots of tunnels with blasting. Soft rock needs support so TBM tunnels and shores up.
[−] rsynnott 30d ago
Yeah, this one looks to be TBM for most of the underground sections.
[−] stavros 30d ago
Thessaloniki had the same issue, and now there's a stop where you have walkways above the ruins.

Some photos of the "before" here:

https://www.thessalonikiguide.gr/metro-thessalonikis-mia-arx...

[−] pjmlp 30d ago
As one of the cities I spend part of my life, the new metro experience is great, and how they integrated the stations into old Greek infrastructure.

I only morn the loss of jobs that could have been part of the metro, if the wagons weren't robots.

[−] stavros 30d ago
That's great to hear, I've only been in it once (I prefer to cycle on the waterfront), but I hear the ticket machines still don't accept cards. Typical Greece, though it's nice that it actually works well for what it is.
[−] pjmlp 29d ago
I was there now during both Easters, they do actually, the biggest problem is having different cards for metro and bus.

Actually we have the same problem in Lisbon and Porto, the cards you can top up are company specific, only the monthly subscriptions work across companies.

[−] stavros 29d ago
I meant credit cards, it used to be that you can only pay cash. I agree, though, in London everything just takes credit cards so you have no dedicated ticket cards. Much more convenient.
[−] ThePowerOfFuet 29d ago

>Actually we have the same problem in Lisbon and Porto, the cards you can top up are company specific

What do you mean? The Navegante works for all of it in Lisboa!

[−] pjmlp 29d ago
Navegante is a monthly ticket I was talking about, replacing the old L1, L12, L123, L123X kind of monthly subscriptions.

If you get simple tickets they will only cover Metro/Carris, then you need additional ones for CP, Fertagus, Transtejo, Softlusa.

Do the multimodal finally cover all of them, it has been a few years since I was a few days in Lisbon beyond the airport and travel north?

It used to be that some could be reused between transports, but only if the amount of travels was empty, and then recharged on the other system, being tied to it, until the travels would reach zero again.

[−] riffraff 29d ago
I believe Athens was the first city to do this some decades ago.

Once again Romans taking "inspiration" from the Greeks :)

[−] mynegation 30d ago
In the same vein, Bloomberg office in London UK has an Ancient Rome museum and the access is free: https://www.bloomberg.org/arts/advancing-the-arts-around-wor... (disclosure: I work for Bloomberg).
[−] janandonly 30d ago
I’ve visited the Mithraeum. It’s maybe not a must see for a tourist, but great that it’s publicly available for free.
[−] ipeev 30d ago
In Sofia we have roman ruins everywhere around metro stations https://archaeology-travel.com/bulgaria/serdika-ii-metro-sta...
[−] sleepyguy 30d ago
It's quite interesting to see how much earth is typically above ancient ruins. Cities built upon cities for 1000's of years where a street or building was once at ground level and now is 2-4 stories beneath our modern world.

While visiting Vienna, there are ruins on display in Michaelerplatz (central Old City), so cool.

[−] foxglacier 29d ago
I've always been confused how this works. Did people shovel soil on top of buildings then build new buildings on that? Why? Did it accumulate naturally perhaps during periods when a site was unoccupied? Would some buildings be higher than their older neighbors, with entrances above street-level until everyone else caught up?
[−] riffraff 29d ago
I believe in Rome, it was mostly flooding/alluvial debris. But yeah, sometimes buildings would collapse and they would just build again on top of the ruins.

There definitely are instances of buildings being misaligned.

In my ancestral family home there was a door wat ground level, but originally it had a few steps to get to it; the outside ground had gone up by some 40cm with sediments over a century or so.

[−] readthenotes1 29d ago
Or had your house also sunk like Miami is doing?
[−] riffraff 29d ago
good question!

In this case, I think not: there's paving stones under the dirt, if the building had sunk those would have to be comparatively higher up (they don't weigh as much) but they still lay at the front of the steps.

(or I should say, laid, sadly the building had to be levelled after an earthquake)

[−] crooked-v 29d ago
I have to wonder sometimes what an ancient Roman would think of modern Rome. What artifacts would be they grateful to see preserved, and which by contrast would have them thinking 'haha, you dorks care about that?'
[−] riffraff 29d ago
The "mouth of Truth" has attracted tourists for centuries but it was just a drain cover, and it would fit your idea perfectly.
[−] dreamcompiler 29d ago
Amsterdam's Rokin metro station is also set up as an archaeology exhibition. Definitely worth a visit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rokin_metro_station

https://belowthesurface.amsterdam/en/

[−] gignico 30d ago
For reasons, I used to go to Rome quite frequently in the 2010s, and the construction of Metro C was already a meme. But now some of the stations are quite interesting indeed.
[−] dyauspitr 29d ago
In a place like Rome with layers and layers of deep history they should just think of building elevated metro systems.
[−] maurotdo 29d ago
Lot of rumours, truth is it's unmotivated, the station is underwhelming compared to similar stations in Europe and - most important - it's already falling apart and encrusted in dirt, with mafia and corruption handling maintenance and cleaning
[−] argomo 30d ago
Okay, I'll say it: is it really worth encumbering the movements of millions of people for decades in order to make a few boring history exhibits? If you want to see some the bone comb that belonged to somebody's great^100-grandmother, there are dozens of museums that already have one on display.