Americans still opt for print books over digital or audio versions (pewresearch.org)

by thm 70 comments 75 points
Read article View on HN

70 comments

[−] analogpixel 33d ago
Watching TV/Movies through any device is a bother, I have to sift through all the advertisements/brand placements for that device to find anything, and most of the time it's the same 20 movies repeated over and over in every section.

Reading on a E-device is a bother, I have to sift through all the "sponsored" books and whatever other crap the ebook reader company decides to add, and be at the whims of whatever they decide they want to do with "your" device that day.

Cell-phones are a bother, they are just devices optimized for stealing your attention, money, information, or all the above.

Pretty much everything tech related anymore is a bother.

I would love to see someone come out with services for music, movies, books that are just APIs you subscribe to and can use any client you want. Think of the novelty of having an interface where you could ignore movies you never want to see, only show the music genres you care about, and not have advertisements for romance novels on your e-reader.

[−] loloquwowndueo 33d ago

> Reading on a E-device is a bother, I have to sift through all the "sponsored" books and whatever other crap the ebook reader company decides to add

Sounds like you just chose the wrong device. My Boox does none of this. I just put the epub file in the device and read it.

[−] garciasn 33d ago
For me, reading is an escape; from both reality as well as technology. I stare at a screen all fucking day; the last thing I want to do is stare at one during my downtime.

So; I cordon off time every day to read and not touch my devices. Even though I subscribe to streaming music, I prefer to read while listening to vinyl. I have absolutely NO PROBLEM with anyone choosing to read ebooks or do audiobooks; they're just not my preferred way to do it.

[−] loloquwowndueo 33d ago
That’s not what the person I was replying to was complaining about. I don’t know why you put this unrelated (and perfectly valid btw) opinion as a response to me.
[−] garciasn 33d ago
I dunno either. Probably because I was sleepy and clicked the wrong reply link. Carry on kind person. :-)
[−] globular-toast 33d ago
Same with Kobo.
[−] WarOnPrivacy 33d ago

> I would love to see someone come out with services for music, movies, books that are just APIs you subscribe to and can use any client you want.

It won't happen because the one thing more important than money is control.

In the 1990s, the recording industry choose to leave money on the table rather than allow digital music to risk their gatekeeping power. It took years for Apple to bully the MPAA into allowing digital distribution.

[−] wincy 33d ago
This is why I have 50TB of HDD space and a plex server. We tried watching a show on Amazon Prime and it was brutal, so many commercials. My wife skipped backward because we missed a part and were too close to the ad break so it made us watch a second 1:30 reel of unskippable ads. We subscribe to Prime and I still downloaded it. I’m not going to let them boil this frog.
[−] lotsofpulp 33d ago
I cannot relate to this experience at all. I can open up the TV app on my phone/tablet/laptop/TV and watch almost whatever I want pretty quickly, without ad breaks. It is far more convenient than the old set top box situation. I would say I wait a maximum of 60 seconds, and probably 30 seconds most of the time, to start watching what must be a considerably large portion of all professionally produced media in the US.
[−] Loughla 33d ago
How do you do that without ads? Every single service has ads, even on paid tiers. And sponsored content that is recommended regardless of my actual tastes.

This is the reason I buy physical media, rip it to my home server and use Plex. No suggested bullshit. No ads at all.

How do you do that with paid services? What does your setup look like? Because I can't figure out how to do that using commercial products.

[−] lotsofpulp 33d ago
Obviously, product placement ads cannot be avoided.

The ads at the beginning of a show can be skipped pretty easily.

I can mentally ignore sponsored content, but you are right that it is an ad that. I almost never browse though, and just use the search function.

Apple tv+, Amazon prime with the extra $5 per month or whatever, and peacock’s higher tier paid through Apple don’t have ads breaks in the middle of the media for me. Neither did Max when I had it a couple years ago.

Other shows or seasons that are rented with a lifetime license from apple (what they call “buying”) don’t have ad breaks either.

[−] WolfeReader 33d ago
"Reading on a E-device is a bother, I have to sift through all the "sponsored" books and whatever other crap the ebook reader company decides to add, and be at the whims of whatever they decide they want to do with "your" device that day."

My fellow, you are on Hacker News. Think like a hacker, not a consumer.

Plenty of savvy e-book customers here don't have the experience you just described. Look up how to put KOReader ( https://koreader.rocks ) on your current device, and learn how to get your books without DRM. Your e-reading experience will be so much better.

[−] kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 33d ago
Librera Reader is alsoa great open source eBook reader

https://github.com/foobnix/LibreraReader

[−] Telaneo 33d ago
Reading plain EPUBs on whatever device has been a fairly good experience in my opinion, given that that is more or less just going to be the physical book in digital form. Then again, the only way I think people actually find those are through free online downloads and not any actual store front.

Given the choice between 'tainted digital experience' and 'plain analogue experience', I can't blame consumers for choosing the latter, but the 'plain digital experience' does exist. It's just not sold.

I wonder how long it's going to take before the analogue experience becomes tainted. It's, sadly, not unthinkable to put ads in books. I guess there's little point from the perspective of the relevant people if they can't make those ads personalised, but maybe if the enshittification goes far enough, it could happen.

[−] bentley 33d ago

> the only way I think people actually find those are through free online downloads and not any actual store front.

The other day I commented about my DRM‐free ebook sources: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47684550

In my opinion, it’s important to support those publishers and stores that do choose to sell unencumbered media, so that they have some justification to keep doing it.

[−] kQq9oHeAz6wLLS 33d ago
One more to add to your list: baen.com, home of publisher Baen books. Lots of sci-fi and fantasy, all DRM free if you buy direct from them.
[−] spking 33d ago
That was a thing already, in the 1960s and 1970s lots of pulp paperbacks had ads for cigarettes and cheap cologne between chapters, for example.
[−] nottorp 33d ago

> Then again, the only way I think people actually find those are through free online downloads and not any actual store front.

Mostly correct, but some publishers have seen the light.

Asimov's magazine used to be on kindle subscriptions, then on some dubious application no one had heard of, but now they offer drm-free epubs, for example.

[−] WarOnPrivacy 33d ago

> I have to sift through all the advertisements/brand placements for that device to find anything, and most of the time it's the same 20 movies repeated over and over

That's our new norm too. We still subscribe to a number of streaming services - but we count on piracy to get the experience that we pay for.

[−] walterbell 33d ago
CheapCharts + iTunes Store + Apple TV (non-subscription) = zero ads and offline viewing.
[−] dinkumthinkum 33d ago
I sort of get your point but I feel like its also a bit curmudgeon-y. In order to have the movies, shows, whatever, it has to be paid for somehow. Also, I think there is something to be said for discovering things. If you just have an API, what is the interface then? Is it like millions bespoke vibe-coded clients? That sounds like a bother too. How do you know in advance if a movie is something you want to see? I guess Dario or Altman can decide for us but what if they become a bother?
[−] gyomu 33d ago

> I would love to see someone come out with services for music, movies, books that are just APIs you subscribe to and can use any client you want. Think of the novelty of having an interface where you could ignore movies you never want to see, only show the music genres you care about, and not have advertisements for romance novels on your e-reader.

This exists, but it's not a VC-backed product or public company because the money to be made comes from all the "bother" you identified.

[−] rbits 33d ago
That's why I got an e-reader. So I'm not reading books on a phone that's distracting me all the time. I don't know what e-reader you got, but on mine I just press the power button and it brings me right into the book I was reading, no ads or distractions.
[−] classified 33d ago

> Pretty much everything tech related anymore is a bother.

They have been optimizing for enshittification and they became really good at it. I have no idea how to get rid of these business practices. Users just leaving those abusive platforms clearly doesn't work.

[−] Cider9986 33d ago
You can solve all the problems you describe; it just takes some setup.

>Watching TV/Movies through any device is a bother, I have to sift through all the advertisements/brand placements for that device to find anything, and most of the time it's the same 20 movies repeated over and over in every section.

Pirate streaming sites[1] are more convenient, have fewer ads, and offer more selection than commercial streaming; they are much less reliable than the following options, however. Torrents have no ads, highest quality, and the largest selection, but you have to download each file manually. Good for preservation, less convenient. Stremio[2]+Torrentio[3]+Debrid[4] allow no ads, highest quality, a large selection, and streaming. This is my preferred option—this is the Spotify of movies and TV.

>Reading on a E-device is a bother, I have to sift through all the "sponsored" books and whatever other crap the ebook reader company decides to add, and be at the whims of whatever they decide they want to do with "your" device that day.

Kindle jailbreak[5] + KoReader[6] + Z-library[7] extension allow you to seamlessly download any book you'd like, directly on your Kindle. No ads, no Amazon connections, and your subsidized device[8].

>Cell-phones are a bother, they are just devices optimized for stealing your attention, money, information, or all the above.

GrapheneOS[9] comes with zero Google services or telemetry by default, and without stock bloatware or notification spam, combined with robust permissions, it goes a long way toward making your phone feel like a tool. I recommend Olauncher[10] for a distraction-free home screen.

>Pretty much everything tech related anymore is a bother.

I feel you. All of this takes effort and knowledge that people shouldn't have to acquire just to have a decent experience with their own devices. But these options exist, they are getting better, and the more people adopt them, the less leverage companies have to keep enshittifying.

[1] https://github.com/fmhy/FMHY/wiki/Streaming

[2] https://github.com/Stremio

[3] https://github.com/TheBeastLT/torrentio-scraper

[4] https://github.com/Viren070/guides

[5] https://github.com/KindleModding/kindlemodding.github.io

[6] https://github.com/koreader/koreader

[7] https://github.com/ZlibraryKO/zlibrary.koplugin

[8] https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/kindle/comments/1s69qnh/

[9] https://grapheneos.org

[10] https://github.com/tanujnotes/Olauncher

[−] daoboy 33d ago
Physical books are irreplaceable to me. I love the feel, the smell, and having a house full of them. Just went to a library sale this morning and got even more.

I also really need a break from screens, and reading a book is a great excuse to not be on my phone or watching tv.

[−] keiferski 33d ago
I’ve found that I have a hard time remembering what ebooks I’ve read, whereas the physical form of a print book makes it stick in my memory more.

Some kind of physical “totem” that came with an ebook would be an interesting idea, like a bookmark or a postcard-sized note.

[−] bentley 33d ago
I read about two dozen books a year, the majority as audiobooks, most of the rest as ebooks, and typically one or two in print. I quite like print books, but favor ebooks for the minimal size and weight. I prefer ebooks to audiobooks too, but have far more opportunities to listen to an audiobook than to sit down and read an ebook.

Even though print books are by far the minority of my reading, I still purchase print copies of books I enjoy, for discoverability. I’ve loved reading since childhood because I grew up in a house filled to bursting with my parents’ books. Nobody told me to read Tolkien, or Heinlein, or Verne, or Jack London, or Greek mythology—I simply took those books off the shelf and read them. And when we visited friends and family, I would read books from their shelves too. None of my young relatives have access to my ebook or audiobook history, and I’m not going to hammer my own interests into their heads… but I’m lucky enough to have lots of space, so I keep my bookshelves overflowing.

[−] el_jay 33d ago
On top of all the extremely valid points about the ad-driven cognitive friction inherent to modern device usage: print books can’t get yoinked off my shelf because a rich person with political connections wants that.
[−] flats 33d ago
It’s the complete disregard of typesetting in ebooks that has always repelled me. I fundamentally reject the notion that all books can be reduced to text files. Design matters!
[−] UltraSane 33d ago
I read for information and online communication. I mostly consume books via audiobooks which are awesome when combined with good bluetooth earbuds and a local server like Audiobookshelf. Audiobooks are great because I can multitask by listening when I am walking, biking, lifting, driving, or shopping. I've listened to every Discworld novel and the entire Malazan series. I would never had actually sat down and read the malazan series.
[−] SilentM68 33d ago
I used to browse bookstores all the time in the past, but there are fewer and fewer physical bookstores around. Malls have been closing down for the longest time. Even when books were available, the prices were extremely high. I'm excluding school textbooks prices which are and always remain ultrahigh. If prices were more reasonable, I would think that more people would opt for physical books.
[−] nicbou 33d ago
I moved to paper after years of reading digitally. I find it easier to stay engaged because a book has only one purpose while my iPad Mini also has Instapaper and the internet. It’s also much easier to pick up and keep reading, and the book itself is a progress indicator.

I also love sharing paper books with friends. It’s a little experience that ebooks don’t give you.

[−] thot_experiment 33d ago
It's probably been well over a decade since the last time I read a book, maybe two. Maybe it's an ADHD thing? but my retention and immersion is just so so so much deeper when I listen to audiobooks, even at 1.6x-2x (depending on the narrator) I feel like I'm transported in a way that reading physically just doesn't give me.
[−] skywhopper 33d ago
Because they are better in almost every way.
[−] sacredSatan 33d ago
I like the convenience of ebooks but the physical feel of paperback is unmatched.

I can still remember where I was when I read a certain book or even a chapter in case of a physical book. With my kindle it's a blur to me.

I also like to see my bookmark gradually make its way down the book over time.

[−] jrmg 33d ago
I’m surprised to see digital books are still growing in popularity. I notice way few Kindles in airports and on planes in recent years compared to ten or fifteen years ago.

I guess people are reading books on their phones and tablets?

[−] pseingatl 33d ago
The problem with printed books is issues suffered by the visually impaired. It's not an issue solely with font size; printed books have no dark mode. If you're a digital nomad, weight is an issue as well.
[−] e40 32d ago
Often the digital version is more than the dead tree version. Generally, I buy the dead tree versions and download the digital versions for my kindle.
[−] akkartik 33d ago
I haven't purchased a DRM'd ebook in 8 years.
[−] booleandilemma 33d ago
Physical books are great. No ads, no battery to charge, no worry the content is going to be censored because somebody somewhere decides they don't like what they say. No worry they're going to be removed from my shelf. I can lend them to whomever I want. I can mark them up. The book in its current form is perfect. We don't really need to change it.

And then there's the whole experience of going into a bookstore and just looking around. It's wonderful. One of the last things our society has yet to fuck up.

[−] MajorTakeaway 33d ago
I just bought 'Psychology and Life' sixteenth edition and pondered just how much worse an ebook version of it would have been or unbearably clunky a pdf version would be as well.

The less screen time I spend, the better I feel.

[−] nottorp 33d ago
Space the final frontier. They didn't know how right they were in Star Trek.

I mean space to store all those physical books, of course.