Tesla tells HW3 owner to 'be patient' after 7 years of waiting for FSD (electrek.co)

by breve 214 comments 224 points
Read article View on HN

214 comments

[−] iugtmkbdfil834 27d ago
Full disclosure. I am currently shorting TSLA so take what I am about to post with an appropriate amount of salt.

I gotta say I am continuously amazed how much Musk is allowed to get away with. I know he can get some things done and he is, apparently, skilled manager, fund raiser and bs'er of epic proportions, but I have a hard time understanding how all this didn't catch up to him yet.

[−] nickvec 27d ago
As it turns out, having unfathomable amounts of wealth lets you get away with just about anything.
[−] 2OEH8eoCRo0 27d ago
He has immense wealth from fraud and he is able to commit fraud because of his immense wealth.
[−] MattDamonSpace 27d ago
Rockets land
[−] disqard 26d ago
Elon can remain a successful bs'er longer than you can remain solvent... or something like that.
[−] DANmode 27d ago
You don’t get away with it.

If you can’t walk into a pizzeria on a whim (thinking about sama this week), you no longer have your freedom.

[−] b00ty4breakfast 27d ago
The freedoms afforded by obnoxious wealth far outweigh the loss of anonymity. These folks could buy an entire franchise of pizzerias on a whim and have them transported to a chain of private islands in the Pacific.

The myth of the tortured life of the rich and famous is a joke.

[−] UncleMeat 27d ago
Especially given it is a choice. There are ample billionaires who avoid media. The tech billionaires choose this.
[−] mfru 25d ago
Even more especially given it is a choice to be a completely unempathetic prick who thrives on being controversial and edgy
[−] hn_user82179 27d ago
I don't follow, can Musk not do that? Also who/what is sama?
[−] eco 27d ago
It's Sam Altman's HN username.
[−] DANmode 26d ago
Without security?

Sure - but it’s a risk that people of the unknown variety don’t have.

[−] xracy 26d ago
Feels like the world that he created by hoarding vast sums of wealth, and limiting people's free speech, and cutting social safety net programs that put more and more people at risk as the world becomes less and less stable.

I would much rather have lived in the world where he could walk into a pizza place without security and fear. But I also would much rather have lived in the world where people had healthcare and they didn't have to fight companies like UHC tooth and nail to avoid getting their claims denied at every turn.

And the stability of this all comes from trust in Government regulation. Which he gutted, when he gutted the programs that were targeting him for committing fraud.

[−] DANmode 26d ago

> I would much rather have lived in the world where he could walk into a pizza place without security and fear.

I’m not sure I would.

I think I’m okay with there being some remaining consequences for things you do to other people,

even if what you’ve done is legal.

[−] xracy 25d ago
You misunderstand me.

> I think I’m okay with there being some remaining consequences for things you do to other people,

I would rather live in the world where they hadn't done those things to other people. Not that I would rather people forgive them and let them into a pizza shop. It's a pizza shop, who cares, they have a million other ways to get pizza if they want it. Ostracism is the last response we have for the wealthy doing unacceptable things.

[−] Traubenfuchs 27d ago
You can have a private chef make you michelin level pizza in the stone oven in the kitchen of your private jet though.
[−] beng-nl 27d ago
Sounds like a prison. I can honestly say that I wouldn’t like that if i couldn’t appear in public. A luxury prison, but a prison nonetheless.

(Having the money would be nice, of course.)

[−] DANmode 27d ago
Can you also have private and vetted strangers eat and mingle around you,

so you feel like less of a pariah?

[−] M95D 27d ago
Sure, but who would want that?
[−] shye 26d ago
Yes. I know a person that used to work in casting for such events.
[−] gessha 27d ago
I have a VC fund to pitch you. Need a co-founder? /s
[−] CamperBob2 27d ago
What's the old saying, again? "Musk can remain untouchable longer than you can remain solvent."
[−] cj 27d ago
If it's true that Musk is getting rules changes so that SpaceX can be included in the S&P earlier than the current rules allow, I think there's a non-zero chance of Musk falling even more out of favor than he currently is, if not worse (if the SpaceX IPO ends up losing people money in the first 1-2 years)
[−] cosmicgadget 27d ago
I don't imagine anyone is trying to manipulate TSLA with an HN comment so I consider your position to be putting your money where your mouth is.
[−] stackghost 27d ago
Hey maybe he actually is a genius. After all, he committed securities fraud at least twice and so far has suffered zero consequences.
[−] platevoltage 27d ago
The more money you have, the more you can get away with, and he has the most money. Capitalism baby.
[−] stringfood 27d ago
well he is the wealthiest most powerful person in the world right now, mainly because of SpaceX - I think this gives him plot armour until his eventual demise in 8.3 years
[−] wjnc 27d ago
He should try to cancel the original purchase agreement on the grounds that now the functionality is available Tesla has demonstrated no intention of delivering it to him, thus voiding the original agreement. Normally if a judge agrees, you get a full refund without controlling for depreciation.

Class actions in the Netherlands mostly favor lawyers.

[−] embedding-shape 27d ago
Here is the website where you (as a European) can gather and hopefully help provide more weight to the matter if you were among the ones that were promised something you're not gonna receive: https://hw3claim.nl/

It's run by the person mentioned in the article, and unsurprisingly the domain is Dutch, but seems the same thing will apply in lots of countries if FSD rolls out there too, not just Netherlands.

[−] alHqn 27d ago
It will come right after terraforming Mars is complete, which will be next year. We will also have UBI and all illegal immigrants on Republican farms will have been replaced by Optimus robots.
[−] skywhopper 27d ago
I’m forever dismayed that no government agency has cracked down on Tesla’s endless fraudulent claims. It’s a shame people were falling for it 7 years ago, much less today, but only the governments can enforce actual fairness.
[−] jijojv 27d ago
Paid twice into Full Scam of the Decade since 2016 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3HCTVk3qME driver is just there for legal reasons)
[−] rubiquity 27d ago
I have both HW3 (2021 Y) and HW4 (2025 3). FSD in the HW4 is a delight. FSD in HW3 phantom brakes constantly both back when FSD was a pile of C++ and now with the "Lite" driving model. I don't see how Tesla can ever make FSD suitable on HW3 given the hardware (<200 TOPS).
[−] adocomplete 27d ago
Bought FSD with my Model 3 back in 2018 here in the states. FSD still not delivered and no realistic timeline. Tesla is hoping we upgrade or sell car, but luckily we don't drive much and plan to keep it as long as it keeps running, so they'll have to make us whole eventually.
[−] zackify 27d ago
I'm one of these unlucky owners. I can't believe I'll ever get anything.

After paying the full cost and being stuck on old software that had a promise of having the hardware required for it

[−] Flatcircle 27d ago
rode with my friend from San Francisco down to San Diego in his Tesla, and he literally didn't touch the wheel or the pedals the whole time. Then a couple days later we drove back the same way.

People don't talk about these cars driving themselves enough imho

[−] vostrocity 27d ago
Not a Tesla fan or owner here, but I tested a friend's HW3 Model Y on FSD (Supervised) and it was completely competent. Not sure why EU owners seem to not have it.
[−] kingleopold 27d ago
this is funny because roadstar is no longer coming ever and they paid even more deposit there.
[−] jrochkind1 27d ago
Is the amount of money they'd have to refund if they just refunded everyone prohibitive, or is it more of an image/messaging thing, admitting you, erm, took them for a ride? It's clear those customers are never going to get it.
[−] mlmonkey 27d ago

> 3,000 owners from 29 countries signed up — representing over €6 million in FSD purchases.

The math doesn't work out. It should be \euro 20,000,000 in FSD purchases, no?

[−] gigatexal 27d ago
So many people worshipped the jobs distortion field but it was nothing compared to the gaslighting Elon has been able to do with Tesla. The man promised things he couldn’t deliver over and over and over again and investors are it up turning his company into a meme stock devoid of any kind of fundamentals.
[−] enslavedrobot 27d ago
I have HW3 in Canada and I use FSD everyday. It regularly drives me for my entire commute with no interventions.

The fact that FSD in Europe has been massively delayed is mostly the fault of regulators.

Sad but true.

[−] josefritzishere 27d ago
Telsa appears to be doing crime. The EU does have clas action lawsuits. I expect one way or another Elon will have to issue refunds.
[−] deckar01 27d ago
[dead]
[−] s5300 27d ago
[dead]
[−] daft_pink 27d ago
I think the government is going to have to get involved for FSD from any manufacturer to actually take place.
[−] dmix 27d ago
The article is about a Dutch owner of an older Tesla who bought with the intention of using FSD (supervised) with HW3 but the government has not approved it's use for that model so the person can't use it.

You can use FSD with HW3 in other countries like Canada.

[−] Freedumbs 27d ago
[flagged]