consumer451
Member since 2018
•
Karma: 12,491
•
4,548 submissions
contact: user @ gmail<p>Absolutists have not thought it through. Fallibilism always wins. Don't take yourself so seriously, I do not.<p>---<p>Privacy & Agency Rant:<p>While we missed the boat on Internet tracking, there is still time to avoid sailing through the final frontier of neural tracking.<p>Thanks to the BCI, we will soon be offered the trade of our privacy for the convenience of password-free login. Next, there will be a quick TSA neural scan prior to boarding.<p>Then, thought crime will become a literal thing. If particular thoughts are not outlawed outright, they will at least prevent you from certain activities.<p>> Proposed neuro-rights include the right to identity, or the ability to control both one's physical and mental integrity; the right to agency, or the freedom of thought and free will to choose one's own actions; the right to mental privacy, or the ability to keep thoughts protected against disclosure; [0]<p>For a great breakdown on the SOTA (2023) tech, and the long term implications, please see this podcast with full written transcript.<p>> Sean Carroll & Nita Farahany on Ethics, Law, and Neurotechnology [1]<p>[0] https://www.cirsd.org/en/horizons/horizons-winter-2021-issue-no-18/its-time-for-neuro--rights<p>[1] https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/03/13/229-nita-farahany-on-ethics-law-and-neurotechnology/